hgfdsa5 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2704563
this is invincible
No it isn't
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2706411
hgfdsa5 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2704563
this is invincible
Irial wrote:hgfdsa5 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2704563
this is invincible
No it isn't![]()
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2706411
dntn31 wrote:Irial wrote:hgfdsa5 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2704563
this is invincible
No it isn't![]()
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2706411
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2707102


hgfdsa5 wrote:mine was invincible but you cheated on the height rule
I think that using less parts then you did should make it fair. And if you don't agree. then i put in this design instead:mnoed wrote:Hiccup110 wrote:mnoed wrote:NEVER
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2612910
Owned
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2613136
Umm for 1, you connected your contraption to mine, and 2 you drew over the line, disqualified!

hgfdsa5 wrote:mine was invincible but you cheated on the height rule
dntn31 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2719174

hgfdsa5 wrote:mine was invincible but you cheated on the height rule

mnoed wrote:dntn31 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2719174
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2723384
sald wrote:mnoed wrote:dntn31 wrote:http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2719174
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2723384
http://FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2723742

Users browsing this forum: No registered users