, however, it very much did have a
, and he just didn't see it.Other than that, though, he seems pretty good.
, however, it very much did have a
, and he just didn't see it.halfmaster1 wrote:I used to like Skeezix until he downrated one of my levels because it didn't have a, however, it very much did have a
, and he just didn't see it.
Other than that, though, he seems pretty good.
zhyrek wrote:Here's another one that looks plausible: http://fantasticcontraption.com/designs?levelId=611434
:D
halfmaster1 wrote:zhyrek wrote:Here's another one that looks plausible: http://fantasticcontraption.com/designs?levelId=611434
:D
The thing is though, someone had already solved my level in one piece. It might not have been a good level, but if anything, it was too easy, not too hard.
While most of the time I agree with him, he can be a little over the top.
ScienceGuy2012 wrote:Sheezix doesn't know what a variation is. If you publish variations of a level, he will create a design called "Hey Stoopid" with a description of "How many times are you going to repost this level ****?"
halfmaster1 wrote:ScienceGuy2012 wrote:Sheezix doesn't know what a variation is. If you publish variations of a level, he will create a design called "Hey Stoopid" with a description of "How many times are you going to repost this level ****?"
He knows what a variation is, and thinks they are stupid.
/Cronkite
Xizeeks wrote:http://www.fantasticcontraption.com/?designId=11861564
Not the first time I've been mistaken, and likely not the last.
rianbay812 wrote:Xizeeks wrote:http://www.fantasticcontraption.com/?designId=11861564
Not the first time I've been mistaken, and likely not the last.
I respect you for that.
Keep up the good work
schmittd wrote: i feel the level should be given a chance
Users browsing this forum: Brian3.14